Results for "AT&T"

AT&T’s International Roaming Fees

September 24th, 2019

January 2019: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the company’s petition for permission to appeal the district court’s August 2018 order. (AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. McArdle, Case No. 18-cv-80102, 9th Cir.) August 2018: A federal judge granted part of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and certified the class of individuals who


AT&T Customer Data

August 6th, 2019

In July 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly misleadingly representing that it does not share or sell data about customers when, according to the complaint, the company routinely provides information about the real-time location of customers to third parties without the customers’ consent and without legal authority. (Scott et al v.


AT&T’s Bait-and-Switch Marketing

July 2nd, 2019

In June 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly deceptively using a bait-and-switch advertising scheme in which it advertises flat monthly rates for wireless service plans when, according to plaintiffs, the company fails to disclose certain fees and the amount customers pay each month is actually higher than advertised. (Vianu et al


AT&T Fiber

October 25th, 2017

“With AT&T Fiber, the future is here,” the telecom says. But is it really?


AT&T’s Bait and Switch Tactics

June 9th, 2016

In June 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly using bait and switch tactics by advertising calling plans on the packaging of GoPhones that AT&T does not offer. The named plaintiff claims that, when he was activating the phone, AT&T informed him that it did not have the “10¢ per minute for


AT&T “Unlimited” Wireless Service Plans

May 12th, 2016

March 2016: The lawsuit was dismissed because the summons was not returned with proof that it was served, as required by Massachusetts law. October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against AT&T for allegedly deceptively marketing wireless service data plans as “unlimited” when the plans are actually limited by numerous conditions and the company does


AT&T’s “Unlimited” Data Plans

April 18th, 2016

April 2016: A federal judge granted plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of its February 2016 decision to compel arbitration in the Roberts case. February 2016: A federal judge granted AT&T’s motion to compel arbitration in the Roberts case. July 2015: Two class-action lawsuits were filed against AT&T for allegedly deceptively promoting “unlimited” data plans. According to


AT&T’s $160 for 10 GB Plan

April 28th, 2014

This ad could make it seem, to a reasonable consumer, that your family of four will pay only $160 a month for a phone plan that includes 10 GB of data. Here’s the catch: Unless you’re bringing your own phones to AT&T and plan on never getting a new phone, you probably won’t pay $160



Back to Top ↑