Results for "Hain Celestial"

Hain Celestial Group and JĀSÖN Natural Products

September 26th, 2016

April 2016: The parties agreed to dismiss this action . March 2016: The parties notified the court that they reached a settlement. The terms have not been disclosed. (Astiana et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. et al, Case No. 11-cv-6342, N. D. CA.) April 2015: An appellate judge reversed a district court’s dismissal


Various Hain Celestial Food Products

June 30th, 2014

April 2016: This case was stayed pending the FDA’s decision regarding the use of the word “natural.” July 2014: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint similarly alleging that the company misleadingly labels products as being “all natural” and containing “no trans fat.” May 2014: A federal judge dismissed some of the class-action claims against The Hain


Celestial Seasonings Teas

November 15th, 2013

June 2017: A federal judge granted partial summary judgment for the injunctive relief class claims concluding that these claims were moot because the company removed “100% Natural” claims from its advertising. Plaintiffs’ individual claims for damages remain. September 2015: A federal judge certified the class for injunctive relief but did not certify the damages class.


Coconut Dream

March 7th, 2019

In March 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly deceptively making health and wellness claims about Coconut Dream (a drink made up of coconut oil and water) – including that it is a “Cholesterol Free Food” – when, according to the complaint, the amount of saturated fat in the


Alba Botanica Very Emollient Mineral Spray Sunscreen

November 14th, 2018

In October 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly failing to adequately inform consumers that Alba Botanica Very Emollient Mineral Spray Sunscreen does not provide the advertised sun protection of “SPF 35” if it is not applied properly. (Manley et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Case No.


Earth’s Best Pre-Moistened Wipes

November 5th, 2018

October 2018: This lawsuit was transferred from state court to federal court. The following day, this case was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Case No. 18-cv-6465, N. D. CA.) August 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly misleadingly marketing pre-moistened wipes as being


Sensible Portions Garden Veggie Straws

May 22nd, 2018

April 2018: A federal judge dismissed this case finding that the challenged statements and images are not misrepresentations and would not mislead reasonable consumers. To learn more about the court’s reasoning, click here to read the full decision. June 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sensible Portions for allegedly misleadingly marketing the vegetable content and


JĀSÖN Products

December 15th, 2017

November 2017: The parties withdrew their appeal, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. October 2017: An objector filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement. September 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. June 2017: Plaintiffs in a false advertising class-action lawsuit against The Hain Celestial Group


BluePrint Cold Pressed Juices and BluePrint Organic Drinks

September 12th, 2017

In September 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group and Hain Blueprint for allegedly misleadingly marketing BluePrint Cold Pressed Juices as being cold pressed, raw, and “Manifreshto” when, according to plaintiffs, the juices are processed after being cold pressed (and the lemon juice is manufactured using a different method). The complaint


JĀSÖN Brand Deodorant Sticks

August 21st, 2017

In August 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly misleadingly marketing JĀSÖN brand deodorant sticks as natural when, according to the complaint, they contain unnatural or synthetic ingredients. (Pecanha et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-4517, N. D. CA.) For more information about natural claims


DeBoles Pasta

May 12th, 2017

May 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. February 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly mislabeling products – including DeBoles Gluten Free Corn Spaghetti Style Pasta, DeBoles Wheat Free Corn Spaghetti Style Pasta, and DeBoles Wheat Free Corn Elbow Style Pasta


Sensible Portions Products

May 12th, 2017

May 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. February 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly misleadingly representing its products – including Sensible Portions Garlic and Chive Pita Bites, Sensible Portions Black Olive Feta Pita Bites, and Sensible Portions Original Salt Pita


Alba Botanica Cosmetics

March 27th, 2017

December 2016: The named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this action , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. February 2016: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court decision dismissing the case and remanded the case for further proceedings. The appellate court found that plaintiffs’ allegations were sufficient. January 2014: Plaintiffs filed a


JĀSÖN® Personal Care Products

March 27th, 2017

September 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed because, as part of a settlement in another lawsuit (Brown v. The Hain Celestial Group), the named plaintiff in this case will be added as a named plaintiff in Brown. To learn more about the Brown case, click here. May 2013: This lawsuit was transferred to another California


Jason® and Avalon Organics® Products

October 11th, 2016

February 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. October 2015: A federal judge preliminary approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive either: A cash refund of 50% of the purchase price (those who do not have proof of purchased can recover a maximum


“Dream” Drink Products

July 27th, 2016

April 2016: After the lawsuit was transferred to another California court, the action in this case was stayed (i.e., suspended) pending further guidance from the FDA regarding the use of the term “natural” in connection with food products. (Anderson et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. 14-cv-3895, N. D.


BluePrintJuice and BluePrintCleanse

July 11th, 2016

December 2013: All of the claims in this action were dismissed . The reasons have not been disclosed. October 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Hain Celestial Group, Inc., ZSBPW LLC, and Blueprint Wholesale LLC for allegedly falsely marketing fruit and vegetable juice products – including BluePrintJuice and BluePrintCleanse – as “unpasteurized” and “100%


Earth’s Best Organic Mini Waffles

October 20th, 2014

November 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. October 2014: A federal judge allowed some of the false advertising allegations in a class-action lawsuit against Hain Celestial Group to move forward. The remaining claims allege that the company misleadingly labels Earth’s Best Organic Mini Waffles as “all


“Earth’s Best” Brand Products

July 18th, 2014

In July 2014, another class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that the company misleadingly labels the “Earth’s Best” brand products – including infant foods, baby foods, kids’ foods, baby care products, and home care products –as “all natural” and “organic” when, in actuality, the products contain



Back to Top ↑