Results for "adore me"

Adore Me’s Automatic Renewals

November 21st, 2017

August 2016: The named plaintiff withdrew the complaint and voluntarily dismissed this case . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. November 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Adore Me, an online lingerie company, for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms and conditions of its automatic renewal and


Adore Me’s Marketing of Automatic Renewals

November 21st, 2017

February 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed after the named plaintiff settled her individual claims. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. October 2016: Another class-action lawsuit was filed against Adore Me for allegedly deceptively marketing its automatic and continuous service offers by failing to adequately disclose the terms and charging consumers without


Adore Me’s VIP Membership

November 13th, 2017

August 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s claims were dismissed and the class members’ claims were dismissed . July 2016: This lawsuit was transferred from state to federal court. (Miller et al v. Adore Me, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 16-cv-5230, C. D.


Adore Me Deceiving You, According to Ad Watchdog TINA.org

May 10th, 2016

MADISON, CONN. May 10, 2016 Sexy designer lingerie at a discount is the premise behind Adore Me, one of the rising players in the fast growing subscription-goods industry. But an investigation by ad watchdog truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has revealed what’s underneath the company’s marketing claims – a deceptive negative option offer that can trap consumers into


Adore Me Consumer Complaints

May 9th, 2016

Complaints to FTC Complaints to New York AG Complaints to BBB Sampling of Reviews Posted on BBB pag


Marketers Downplay Consumer Harm Caused by Negative Option Offers

December 10th, 2019

Marketers are attempting to put a positive spin on the negative option, a type of offer that interprets a consumer’s silence as consent to be repeatedly charged for products or services they may not want or need. In comments to the FTC, which is exploring “ways to improve its existing regulations for negative option marketing,”


Adore Organic Innovations Anti-aging Claims

November 1st, 2019

October 2018: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed because the objector did not pay the filing and docketing fees. August 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in the month, an objector filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the approval of the settlement. April 2018: A federal judge preliminarily approved a


Adore CELLMAX Products

August 29th, 2017

August 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. May 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Adore Organic Innovations for allegedly falsely marketing ADORE CELLMAX products as containing an “exclusive Plant Stem Cell Formula” that restores the youthful appearance of skin and provides other anti-aging benefits when,


Sony PS4 “Killzone: Shadow Fall” Game Graphics

May 28th, 2015

May 2015: The parties agreed to dismiss the plaintiff’s individual claims in this lawsuit with prejudice, meaning that the plaintiff cannot refile the claims. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. August 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC for allegedly misrepresenting the technological capabilities of the


TINA.org in the News

January 5th, 2017

2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012   ​ “Brian Ross Investigates: ‘Made in the USA?’ Walmart Labels Under Fire” Stephanie Zimmermann, January 15, 2021 “Under the FTC’s Made in USA standard, only products that are ‘all or virtually all’ made in the



Back to Top ↑