Results for "amicus"

Quorn Products Containing Mycoprotein

September 7th, 2017

September 2017: A federal judge granted plaintiff’s motion for final approval of the revised settlement. July 2017: The parties amended the settlement agreement. Among other things, the revised terms require that Quorn product labels state “Mycoprotein is a mold (member of the fungi family). There have been rare cases of allergic reactions to products that

Duracell Ultra Advanced and Ultra Power Batteries

July 26th, 2017

March 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied . January 2015: filed an amicus brief supporting a December 2015 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, which urges the Court to review the case. July 2015: An appellate court judge affirmed the district court’s approval of the settlement of this lawsuit.

CVS Algal-900 DHA

June 29th, 2017

September 2016: A federal judge granted’s Motion for leave to file the second letter as . August 2016: files a second letter as amicus curiae opposing the amended settlement agreement. June 2016: filed a letter as opposing the proposed settlement. To learn more about’s involvement in the case, click here. Later in the News

January 5th, 2017

2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 “The Baffling Rise of Goop“ Olga Khazan, 12 September, 2017 “But Truth in Advertising, a consumer-advocacy group, cited earthing in a database of 50-some instances in which Goop promoted unsubstantiated products or claims. Last month, Truth in Advertising urged two California district attorneys to

Stream Energy and Ignite

October 4th, 2016

September 2016: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision to certify the class, meaning that the case may proceed as a class action. May 2016: filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the District Court’s decision to certify the class. To read’s brief, click here. March 2016: The

Status & Updates

June 6th, 2016

September 20, 2016: Court grants’s Motion for Leave to file second amicus curiae letter. August 16, 2016: files a second letter with the Court as amicus curiae, this time opposing the amended settlement agreement and again urging the Court to deny preliminary approval of the settlement. June 24, 2016: The parties reach an amended settlement agreement,

Marketing of Vitaminwater

April 19th, 2016

April 2016: A federal judge issued a decision granting final approval of the settlement. January 2016: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement, which was preliminarily approved in October 2015. Later that month, filed a brief as opposing the terms of the proposed settlement. For a summary of’s legal efforts in this

Status and Updates

January 15th, 2016

March 21, 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied . January 14, 2016: files amicus brief in support of Petition for Writ of to the United States Supreme Court, urging the Court to review this case. &nbs

Summary of Action

January 15th, 2016

In 2013, the Gillette Company and Proctor & Gamble settled a class-action lawsuit over the allegedly deceptive marketing of Duracell Ultra batteries.  (Plaintiffs alleged that the companies falsely marketed Ultra batteries as lasting longer than the standard CopperTop batteries when that wasn’t the case.)  The settlement provided $5.68 million to the plaintiffs’ attorneys, $6 million worth of Duracell products

Summary of Action

January 13th, 2016

Since 2009, several class-action lawsuits have been filed against Coca-Cola and its subsidiary Glacéau, all alleging that the companies falsely advertise Vitaminwater as a healthy alternative to soda. In fact, Vitaminwater is marketed as a “nutrient enhanced water beverage” that is good for your immune system and eyes, among other things, when, in reality, a

Status and Updates

January 13th, 2016

April 7, 2016: Judge issues an opinion explaining the March final approval of the settlement. March 21, 2016: Judge approves the settlement over’s and others’ objections. February 26, 2016: Judge grants’s Motion for Leave at the Final Fairness Hearing but reserves judgment on whether to approve or reject the proposed settlement agreement. February 19, 2016: Plaintiffs file an

Summary of Action

November 30th, 2015

A class-action lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of Texas against an venture promoting energy services known as Stream Energy.  The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that the company is actually a pyramid scheme, that they lost money as a result of being deceptively lured in by the company, and that the company is

Status & Updates

November 30th, 2015

April 28, 2017: Defendants/Appellants file a Petition for a Writ of with the United States Supreme Court. September 30, 2016: The Fifth Circuit affirms the District Court’s decision to certify the plaintiff class. May 16, 2016: files amicus brief in favor of Plaintiffs/Appellees and in support of affirmance of the District Court’s decision to certify the class. March


June 23rd, 2015

June 2015: After a class member filed a Notice of Appeal indicating that he was appealing the Court’s final approval of the settlement agreement and the approval of attorneys’ fees, the parties agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice (meaning that the appeal cannot be refiled). The terms of the dismissal have not been disclosed

Wellesse Joint Movement Glucosamine Supplements

May 27th, 2015

May 2015: After the final fairness hearing in March, a federal judge granted final approval of this settlement. February 2015: filed an brief opposing the terms of the proposed settlement as unfair to consumers because it does not remediate the deceptive marketing as alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint. For a summary of’s legal efforts


May 19th, 2015

May 2015: After a final fairness hearing, a federal judge granted final approval of the proposed settlement of this class-action lawsuit. March 2015: filed an brief opposing the proposed settlement as unfair to consumers. To read’s full brief, click here. For a summary of’s efforts in this case, click here. December 2014:

Walgreen Glucosamine Supplements

March 26th, 2015

March 2015: A federal judge granted final approval of the revised settlement agreement. January 2015: The parties to the lawsuit renegotiated the settlement agreement and filed an amended agreement in court. The amended agreement prohibits the defendants from conveying the message that its supplements can repair, strengthen, or rebuild cartilage (and is no longer limited

Summary of Action

March 17th, 2015

A class-action lawsuit was filed against Herbalife in 2013 alleging that the company deceptively markets and operates an illegal pyramid scheme, which charges inappropriate shipping and handling fees in order to bolster illegal profits. In October 2014, the parties reached a proposed settlement agreement that would essentially ban the estimated 1.3 million class members from ever

Back to Top ↑