Results for "automatic renewal"

Synapse Group’s Automatic Renewals of Magazine Subscriptions

July 17th, 2020

June 2019: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. March 2019: A state court judge granted preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to its terms, class members may receive a pro rata share of the settlement fund after other expenses – including attorneys’ fees, service payments, litigation expenses, and


Seaworld’s Automatic Renewals of EZ Pay Plans

August 23rd, 2019

April 2019: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. June 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to its terms, class members may receive a pro rata share of an $11,500,000 settlement fund after attorneys’ fees and service awards are paid. The amount class members receive will be


Code 42 Software’s Automatic Renewal and Continuous Service Offers

December 1st, 2017

October 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that would resolve this case. According to the settlement terms, each class member may receive an equal share of the $400,000 settlement fund after other costs – including attorneys’ fees, a service payment to the named plaintiff, and other administration costs – are paid. It


Adore Me’s Automatic Renewals

November 21st, 2017

August 2016: The named plaintiff withdrew the complaint and voluntarily dismissed this case . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. November 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Adore Me, an online lingerie company, for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms and conditions of its automatic renewal and


Adore Me’s Marketing of Automatic Renewals

November 21st, 2017

February 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed after the named plaintiff settled her individual claims. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed. October 2016: Another class-action lawsuit was filed against Adore Me for allegedly deceptively marketing its automatic and continuous service offers by failing to adequately disclose the terms and charging consumers without


McAfee’s Automatic Renewals and Reference Pricing

March 27th, 2017

In October 2016, plaintiffs who filed false advertising-class action lawsuits against McAfee in 2014 and 2015 for allegedly charging auto-renewal prices that were higher than what was advertised jointly moved for final approval of a settlement agreement that will, if approved, resolve both lawsuits. According to the proposed settlement terms, class members will receive an


Birchbox’s Automatic Renewals

March 27th, 2017

October 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. March 2016: A federal judge preliminarily approved a proposed settlement of this consolidated lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class members will automatically receive credits for the value of a one-month subscription to be used for the purchase of products or subscriptions from Birchbox.


Blizzard Entertainment’s Automatic Renewal and Continuous Service Offers

July 25th, 2016

August 2015: This action was dismissed as to the named plaintiffs and as to the class members. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. February 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. (a website where consumers can open an account and purchase subscriptions to play computer games, such as


Escape Monthly Automatic Renewal and Continuous Service Offers

July 25th, 2016

December 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed . The reasons for the dismissal have not be disclosed. October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Escape Monthly, a business that sells “Vacations in a Box” (i.e., monthly deliveries of luxury and artisan items from around the world), for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms


AAA’s Automatic Renewal and Continuous Service Offers

July 25th, 2016

March 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. February 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against the American Automobile Association (AAA) for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of the automatic renewal offer or continuous service offer. According to the complaint, the


Caskers Automatic Renewal Offers

July 25th, 2016

In April 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Caskers, LLC (a company offering subscriptions for alcohol deliveries) for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in consumers getting charged without their consent. Later that same month, the lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed .


DreamBrands Automatic Renewal Offers

July 12th, 2016

February 2016: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his claims because the parties reached a settlement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. January 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against DreamBrands, Inc. (a company providing subscriptions for monthly deliveries of energy, physical performance and joint relief supplements) for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the


NAC Marketing Company’s Automatic Renewal Offers

June 16th, 2016

April 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the attorneys’ fees and costs. March 2016: The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed after the parties agreed that all of the matters, except attorneys’ fees and costs, were resolved. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. November 2015: A class-action lawsuit was


LifeLock’s Automatic Renewals

May 11th, 2016

February 2016: A state judge granted final approval of the settlement. July 2015: A state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a deceptive advertising class-action lawsuit filed against LifeLock. Among other things, the complaint (which was filed in January 2015) alleges that the company failed to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal and


LifeLock’s Automatic Renewal and Continuous Service Offers

November 17th, 2015

May 2015: The named-plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. February 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against LifeLock, Inc. for, among other things, allegedly deceptively making automatic renewal and continuous service offers without adequately disclosing the terms for such offers. (Trax et al v.


Hulu Plus Automatic Renewals

April 4th, 2014

In March 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Hulu LLC for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose that customers who upgraded their free Hulu accounts to Hulu Plus would be charged for automatic renewals, in violation of California law. (Kruger et al v. Hulu LLC, Case No. BC540053, Superior Court of the


iTalk Global Communications

August 26th, 2020

August 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-7150, C.D. Cal.) July 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against the provider of international communication and television services iTalk Global Communications for allegedly violating California law by offering service for a limited period of time without adequately disclosing that consumers


Bumble Boost

August 10th, 2020

July 2020: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that would provide class members with both monetary and injunctive relief. Class members who purchased Bumble Boost will receive a cash award in an amount that depends on several factors, including the number of claimants and the amount of the settlement fund (the maximum award


Subscriptions to Consumer Reports

April 15th, 2020

April 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-660, March 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Consumer Reports for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service subscriptions resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Koller et al v. Consumer Reports,



Back to Top ↑