Results for "brain"

Flintstone Healthy Brain Support Supplements

July 11th, 2016

May 2015: The named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this action . The reasons have not been disclosed. October 2014: Another class-action lawsuit was filed against Bayer Healthcare for allegedly falsely advertising Flintstone Healthy Brain Support, a dietary supplement containing Omega-3 DHA, as supporting healthy brain function without scientific evidence to support such claim. (Kaplan et al


Brain Bright

April 11th, 2016

“Light Up Your Drained Brain” claims challenged.


Flintstones Healthy Brain Support Gummies

December 8th, 2014

In December 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Bayer for allegedly falsely advertising the Flintstones Healthy Brain Support supplement (a gummy, chewable supplement with DHA) as able to “Support Healthy Brain Function” without scientific evidence to support such claims. (Gershman et al v. Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-05332, N. D. CA.). For more


Flintstones Healthy Brain Support

October 15th, 2014

December 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed . The reasons have not been disclosed. October 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Bayer Healthcare for allegedly falsely advertising Flintstones Healthy Brain Support, a gummy-chewable dietary supplement containing DHA. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that the company misleadingly represents that taking the supplement supports “healthy brain function” without


Prevagen Supplement

February 13th, 2017

February 2017: Quincy Bioscience moved for an order staying the proceedings in this action pending the resolution of the lawsuit filed against it by the Federal Trade Commission and New York Attorney General in January 2017 (FTC et al v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Co., Inc. et al.). January 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against


Prevagen Products

February 9th, 2017

In February 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Quincy Bioscience for allegedly falsely representing that Prevagen supplements improve memory and provide cognitive benefits, and that the benefits of Prevagen are clinically proven when such claims are not true and without adequate support to make them. (Vanderwerff et al v. Quincy Bioscience Holding Company, Inc.


Prevagen Supplements

January 10th, 2017

A false advertising class-action lawsuit against Quincy Bioscience was dismissed in June 2016. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in March 2015 and transferred to federal court in September 2015, alleged that the company advertises the products as “Clinically Tested” to “Improve[] Memory” by 7.5% within 8 days, 10% within 30 days,


Nootrobox

November 4th, 2016

Studies on ingredients don’t support cognitive claims, NAD warns.


Max Synapse

October 5th, 2016

Supplement company fails to back up better brain claims.


Intellux

September 28th, 2016

Webpage pitching so-called smart pill raises several red flags.



Back to Top ↑