Results for "coq-10"

Lang Pharma Nutrition’s CoQ-10 Softgels

January 24th, 2019

In July 2018, a state judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a class-action lawsuit filed against Lang Pharma Nutrition (a company that supplies retailers with CoQ-10 supplements to sell under their store brand names) and four retailers who sell Lang supplements – Walmart, CVS, Walgreens, and Meijer – alleging that they misleadingly market store brand


Equate High Absorption CoQ-10

January 24th, 2019

December 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The plaintiff also agreed not to refile a similar complaint until the earlier of 90 days after the dismissal or the date the settlement in Jackson v. Lang Pharma Nutrition fails. August 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against


CVS Enhanced Absorption Formula CoQ-10 Dietary Supplements

January 24th, 2019

May 2015: This lawsuit was dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. March 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against CVS Pharmacy and Lang Pharma Nutrition for allegedly falsely advertising CVS Enhanced Absorption Formula CoQ-10 dietary supplements as having enhanced absorption and supporting heart health when, according to the complaint, the supplements do not provide the


Ultra CoQ-10

July 13th, 2016

August 2015: A federal judge dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. December 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against CVS Pharmacy for allegedly falsely marketing Ultra CoQ-10, a dietary supplement. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that CVS claims the supplement has “6X better absorption” when, in reality, it does not. (Harris et


Well at Walgreens Enhanced Absorption Formula CoQ-10

July 11th, 2016

April 2015: The named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this action . The reasons have not been disclosed. January 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreens for allegedly falsely advertising the dietary supplement Well at Walgreens Enhanced Absorption Formula CoQ-10. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company falsely labels the supplement as having “enhanced absorption” when, in



Back to Top ↑