Results for "duracell"

Duracell LED Flashlights with Replacement Batteries

May 21st, 2019

In 2019, a false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against the marketers of Duracell LED flashlights with replacement batteries. The complaint alleges that the companies misleadingly represent that the flashlights provide light for up to one hour and 30 minutes at the high-intensity setting and up to seven hours at the low-intensity setting when, according


Duracell Batteries at Ocean State Job Lots

August 9th, 2017

In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ocean State Job Lot for allegedly deceptively marketing batteries as traditional and authentic Duracell batteries when, according to plaintiffs, the batteries do not meet the specifications for batteries sold in the U.S., but rather meet Asian specifications, which are different. (Stewart et al v. Ocean State


Duracell Ultra Advanced and Ultra Power Batteries

July 26th, 2017

March 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied . January 2015: TINA.org filed an amicus brief supporting a December 2015 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, which urges the Court to review the case. July 2015: An appellate court judge affirmed the district court’s approval of the settlement of this lawsuit.


Duracell Batteries with the Duralock Ring

April 19th, 2016

In March 2016, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed against Gillette and Procter & Gamble alleging that the marketing for Duracell AA and AAA Copper Top batteries with the Duralock ring is misleading. Among other things, the complaint, which was originally filed in November 2014, alleged that various marketing materials – including the


Status and Updates

January 15th, 2016

March 21, 2016: The U.S. Supreme Court denied . January 14, 2016: TINA.org files amicus brief in support of Petition for Writ of to the United States Supreme Court, urging the Court to review this case. &nbs


Summary of Action

January 15th, 2016

In 2013, the Gillette Company and Proctor & Gamble settled a class-action lawsuit over the allegedly deceptive marketing of Duracell Ultra batteries.  (Plaintiffs alleged that the companies falsely marketed Ultra batteries as lasting longer than the standard CopperTop batteries when that wasn’t the case.)  The settlement provided $5.68 million to the plaintiffs’ attorneys, $6 million worth of Duracell products


Duralock Batteries

December 2nd, 2015

In October 2015, a federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the makers of Duracell batteries alleging, among other things, that the marketing (including TV and radio commercials, and product packaging) for Duralock batteries is misleading. The complaint, which was originally filed against The Gillette Company and Procter & Gamble in 2014, alleged that the



Back to Top ↑