Results for "glucosamine"

Move Free Glucosamine Supplements

April 30th, 2021

Allegations: Falsely advertising that Move Free provides joint health benefits when the ingredients in the supplement do not provide such benefits


GNC’s Glucosamine Sulfate

June 2nd, 2020

In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against GNC for allegedly falsely marketing Glucosamine Sulfate. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the ingredients list shows that the supplement contains d-glucosamine sulfate and sodium when, according to the complaint, testing shows the supplement actually contains glucosamine hydrochloride and sodium sulfate instead of glucosamine sulfate and sodium. (Amavizca


CVS Health Glucosamine Supplements

October 17th, 2019

June 2019: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal order. (Case No. 19-55671, 9th Cir.) May 2019: A federal judge dismissed this case finding that the claims were preempted by federal law. February 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against CVS Health for allegedly falsely advertising that CVS Health Glucosamine Joint


Spring Valley Glucosamine Sulfate

July 9th, 2019

In June 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walmart for allegedly falsely stating on the label of Spring Valley Glucosamine Sulfate that each tablet contains 1000 mg of glucosamine sulfate when, according to plaintiffs, the product actually contains glucosamine hydrochloride instead of glucosamine sulfate. (Diamos et al v. Walmart Inc., Case No. 19-cv-5526, C.


Kirkland Signature Extra Strength Glucosamine and Chondroitin Joint Health Products

November 26th, 2018

November 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-2646, S. D. CA.) October 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Costco for allegedly falsely advertising Kirkland Signature Extra Strength Glucosamine and Chondroitin joint health products as providing “meaningful joint health benefits” when, according to plaintiffs, the main ingredients (glucosamine and chondroitin) are


Finest Nutrition Glucosamine Sulfate Supplements

September 10th, 2018

In August 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walgreen Co. for allegedly falsely marketing Finest Nutrition glucosamine sulfate dietary supplements as containing 1000mg of glucosamine sulfate when, according to the complaint, the supplements do not contain any glucosamine sulfate and instead contain glucosamine hydrochloride. (Jackson-Mau et al v. Walgreen Co., Case No. 18-cv-4868, E.


Spring Valley Glucosamine Sulfate

April 3rd, 2018

In March 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Walmart for allegedly mislabeling Spring Valley joint health supplements as containing glucosamine sulfate when, according to plaintiffs, they contain glucosamine hydrochloride and potassium sulfate. The complaint also alleges that, because the supplements do not contain the ingredient on the product label, they are not effective for


Glucosamine Supplements: Rexall, Osteo Bi-Flex, and Others

June 29th, 2017

November 2016: The appeals were voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. Click on the links below to see each motion for dismissal and order dismissing case. Buckley Motion and Dismissal Frank Motion and Dismissal Nunez Motion and Dismissal Sweeney Motion and Dismissal October 2016: Another objector filed a Notice of Appeal


Trigosamine Line of Glucosamine Supplements

November 16th, 2016

November 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement reached between the parties, the terms of which have not been disclosed. September 2016: The parties in a class-action lawsuit filed against Patent Health, L.L.C. in 2013 for allegedly deceptively marketing Trigosamine glucosamine supplements, reached a settlement agreement. The plaintiffs had alleged that


Walgreens Glucosamine and Chondroitin Supplements

September 2nd, 2016

May 2015: The named plaintiff withdrew all of his claims against Walgreen Co. and the Court then dismissed the case . August 2014: A federal judge granted the parties’ motion to stay the action in this case, which is connected to a global settlement pending in a New York court. For more information about the


Walgreens Glucosamine and Chondroitin Supplements

September 2nd, 2016

May 2015: All of the claims in this action were dismissed . May 2014: A federal judge stayed the action in this case pending the outcome of a global settlement in a related case in a New York court. For more information about this New York case, click here. November 2013: A class-action lawsuit was


Walgreen’s Glucosamine/Chondroitin Supplements

September 2nd, 2016

May 2015: The plaintiff dismissed this action . July 2014: A federal judge stayed the action in this case pending the outcome of a global settlement pending in a New York court. For more information about the settlement, click here. November 2013: A class action complaint was filed against Walgreen Co. alleging the company falsely


Natrol’s Glucosamine Supplements

June 9th, 2016

March 2016: The remaining lawsuits (Dao, Eisner, and Lesher) were administratively closed because Natrol filed bankruptcy proceedings. September 2015: One of the named plaintiffs (Nowicki) agreed to dismiss her claims. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. Early 2015: Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Natrol for allegedly falsely advertising that its


Wellesse Joint Movement Glucosamine Supplements

May 27th, 2015

May 2015: After the final fairness hearing in March, a federal judge granted final approval of this settlement. February 2015: TINA.org filed an brief opposing the terms of the proposed settlement as unfair to consumers because it does not remediate the deceptive marketing as alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint. For a summary of TINA.org’s legal efforts


K9 Glucosamine

April 14th, 2015

April 2015: After the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss this lawsuit, a federal judge dismissed this lawsuit with prejudice (meaning that the plaintiffs cannot refile the complaint). The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. August 2014: Although a federal judge trimmed some of the claims in this class-action lawsuit (in response to


Walgreen Glucosamine Supplements

March 26th, 2015

March 2015: A federal judge granted final approval of the revised settlement agreement. January 2015: The parties to the lawsuit renegotiated the settlement agreement and filed an amended agreement in court. The amended agreement prohibits the defendants from conveying the message that its supplements can repair, strengthen, or rebuild cartilage (and is no longer limited


TINA.org’s Action on Glucosamine Settlement Helps Spur Revision

March 25th, 2015

Final Agreement Bans Deceptive Claims Made by Walmart, Walgreens & Supervalu MADISON, CONN. March 25, 2015 — A federal judge has given final approval to a class-action settlement that permanently changes how glucosamine supplements sold by Walmart, Supervalu, and Walgreens stores across the nation can be labeled. The approval comes after the parties in the lawsuit renegotiated



Back to Top ↑