Results for "hair"

Sexy Hair Shampoo

July 10th, 2019

May 2019: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. November 2018: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled in April 2019. For more information, go to http://www.sulfatesettlement.com/. October 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to its


EverSleek KeratinCaring Hair Products

May 31st, 2019

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against L’Oreal for allegedly falsely advertising that EverSleek KeratinCaring shampoos and conditioners contain keratin when, according to plaintiffs, the products do not contain any keratin and do not provide benefits associated with the ingredient. (DeVane et al v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-4362, S. D. NY.)


no!no!™ Hair Removal Products

May 15th, 2019

May 2017: The case was dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. September 2016: An amended complaint in the consolidated class-action lawsuit was filed. This complaint makes similar allegations (i.e., that hair removal treatments permanently remove hair and suppress hair growth when such claims are false)


Balsam Color Hair Dyeing Kits

January 7th, 2019

March 2018: This case was consolidated with another similar lawsuit pending in Alabama, Jones v. Coty, Inc. (Case No. 16-cv-622, S. D. AL.) February 2018: This case was transferred to an Alabama court. (Case No. 18-cv-70, S. D. AL.) October 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly marketing Clairol Balsam


Hair Products from Monat Global

August 15th, 2018

In July 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Monat Global for allegedly promoting haircare products as “safe” and “suitable for all skin and hair types” when, according to plaintiffs, the products may cause serious adverse effects, including scalp irritation and hair loss. Plaintiffs also claim that the company fails to adequately warn consumers of


Haircare Products from Monat Global

July 9th, 2018

June 2018: This case was transferred to a Florida court to be heard with other similar cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). To learn more about the MDL, click here. May 2018: This lawsuit was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-851, S. D. CA.) April 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Monat Global


Monat Haircare Products

June 19th, 2018

June 2018: This case was transferred to a Florida court to be heard with other similar cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). To learn more about the MDL, click here. May 2018: Another class-action lawsuit was filed against Monat Global for allegedly operating as a pyramid scheme, as well as misleadingly marketing its haircare products


Monat Hair Products

June 19th, 2018

June 2018: These three cases (Mcwhortor, Row, and Sohovich) were transferred to a Florida court to be heard with other similar cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). To learn more about the MDL, click here. February and May 2018: Multiple class-action lawsuits were filed against multilevel marketing company Monat Global alleging that the company deceptively


Monat Hair Care Products

June 19th, 2018

June 2018: These four cases (Alabaster, Hoffpauir, Merritt, and Whitmire) were transferred to a Florida court to be heard with other similar cases in a multidistrict litigation (MDL). To learn more about the MDL, click here. February and April 2018: Multiple class-action lawsuits were filed against multilevel marketing company Monat Global Corp. for allegedly misleadingly


The Marketing of Monat Hair Care Products

June 19th, 2018

In June 2018, several class-action lawsuits alleging that the multilevel marketing company Monat Global Corp. deceptively markets its hair care products were transferred to one court to be heard with similar cases. The complaints, which were filed earlier in the year, allege that the company misleadingly markets that its hair care products will provide various


Soft Sheen-Carson Optimum Salon Haircare® brand Amla Legend Rejuvenating Ritual Relaxer Kit

March 1st, 2018

January 2018: The Smith case was transferred to the Southern District of Alabama to be consolidated with similar cases. (Smith v. L’Oreal USA, Inc. and Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC, Case No. 18-cv-19, S. D. AL.) September 2017: Another class-action lawsuit was filed alleging that the marketing for Soft Sheen-Carson Optimum Salon Haircare® brand Amla Legend Rejuvenating


Juice Organics Repairing Hair Products

September 6th, 2017

In September 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Juice Organics for allegedly deceptively marketing its Repairing line of shampoo, conditioner, and hair mask products as being able to repair damaged hair when, according to the complaint, none of ingredients in the products can repair damaged hair. (Rodriguez et al v. Juice Beauty, Inc. d/b/a


Hairburst

May 12th, 2017

Influencer’s lack of disclosure in Instagram post for hair vitamin may only be part of the problem.


Andalou Naturals Hair Care Products

April 25th, 2017

February 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. August 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Andalou Naturals, Inc. for allegedly deceptively marketing its Andalou Naturals line of hair care products as “natural” when the products actually contain synthetic and potentially harmful chemicals. (York et al v.


L’Oreal Paris® Advanced Haircare Total Repair 5 Damage Erasing Balm

March 27th, 2017

February 2017: This action was dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. November 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against L’Oreal for allegedly falsely advertising L’Oreal Paris® Advanced Haircare Total Repair 5 Damage Erasing Balm as having the ability to “repair[] up to one year of


Herbal Essences Wild Naturals Hair Products

March 16th, 2017

In February 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Procter & Gamble Company for allegedly falsely marketing Herbal Essences Wild Naturals hair products as natural when they actually contain synthetic and chemical ingredients. (Takano et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company, Case No. 17-cv-385, E. D. CA.) For more information about natural claims


Hair Vitality

November 29th, 2016

Supplement purporting to regrow hair may not be as effective as its highly touted ingredients.


WEN Hair Care Products

September 26th, 2016

May 2016: After a status conference, the case was closed. The reasons have not been disclosed. March 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against QVC and WEN by Chaz Dean. The complaint alleges that the companies deceptively market products – including varieties of WEN Cleansing Conditioners – as improving hair health and being



Back to Top ↑