Results for "non-toxic"

Method Cleaning Products

July 26th, 2021

Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “non-toxic” when they cause harm to humans and the environment


Simple Green Cleaners

July 8th, 2021

Allegations: Misleadingly advertising cleaners as “non-toxic” when they are harmful to humans, animals and the environment


Dove Men ‘Plant-Based Care’

March 25th, 2021

Spoiler: It’s not so much the overall care that is plant-based but rather specific moisturizing ingredients.


Various Windex Products

June 24th, 2020

In June 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against S.C. Johnson & Son for allegedly misleadingly marketing various Windex products – including Original, Ammonia-Free, Vinegar, and Multisurface – as “Non-Toxic” when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain ingredients that are harmful to humans, animals, and the environment. (Rosenberg et al v. S.C. Johnson & Son,


Krud Kutter Cleaning Products

May 28th, 2020

In May 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Rust-Oleum Corp. for allegedly falsely advertising that Krud Kutter products – including Instant Carpet Stain Remover Plus Deodorizer, Deck & Fence Wash, Driveway Cleaner & Degreaser, Multi-Purpose House Wash, and Kitchen Degreaser & All Purpose Cleaner – are “Non-Toxic” and “Earth Friendly” when, according to plaintiffs,


Windex Products

May 19th, 2020

In May 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against S.C. Johnson & Son for allegedly misleadingly marketing Windex products as “Non-Toxic” when, according to plaintiffs, the formula contains ingredients that are harmful to humans, animals, and the environment. (Moran et al v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Case No. 20-cv-3184, N.D. Cal.) For more of


Windex Vinegar Products

May 12th, 2020

In May 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly marketing Windex Vinegar window cleaning product as an environmentally-friendly alternative to other cleaning products. Specifically, the complaint claims that the company labels the product as having a “Non-Toxic Formula” to convey that it is not harmful to


Every Man Jack

September 24th, 2019

January 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. January 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Presidio Brands for allegedly marketing Every Man Jack products as “naturally derived,” all natural, and non-toxic when they actually contain artificially-processed and synthetic ingredients and


EucoClean Bug Products

September 24th, 2019

November 2018: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. August 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Green Room Marketing for allegedly falsely marketing EucoClean 3-in-1 Bed Bug Defense System and EucoClean Naturals Lice Away as being natural and non-toxic when, according to plaintiffs, they contain alcohol ethoxylate


Kirkland Signature Cleaners

May 15th, 2019

April 2019: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms have not been disclosed. May 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Costco Wholesale Corporation for allegedly misleadingly marketing the Kirkland Signature line of “environmentally responsible” cleaners – including liquid dish soap and laundry detergent – as being green,


Various Method Cleaning and Personal Care Products

August 29th, 2017

July 2017: The Daughtery case was dismissed after the settlement in Vincent v. People Against Dirty was granted final approval. March 2017: The Daughtery case was stayed pending approval of a settlement in a related action, Vincent v. People Against Dirty. November 2016: A federal judge refused to stay the Labrado action pending approval of


Various Seventh Generation Cleaning and Personal Care Products

August 28th, 2017

July 2017: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. May 2017: An objector filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the settlement approval. April 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. October 2016: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for



Back to Top ↑