Results for "smartphones"

Blackberry 10 Series Smartphones

July 25th, 2017

January 2017: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Case No. 16-3318, 3rd Cir.) August 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the July 2016 dismissal. July 2016: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss finding that, among other things, plaintiffs failed to plead

Galaxy S4 Smartphone

October 1st, 2021

Allegations: Falsely representing the speed and storage capacity of Samsung Galaxy S4 smartphones

Logitech Video Home Security Systems

July 30th, 2021

Allegations: Misleadingly representing that its security systems would provide reliable home security and consumers would be able to view videos on their computers, smartphones, and tablets when the security systems were unreliable and inoperable due to a defect


October 30th, 2018

Streaming sports on this app may require you to move around a bit, undercutting claims that you can watch “wherever you are.”

Logitech Home Security Systems

April 11th, 2018

In March 2018, a federal judge dismissed the false advertising claims in a class-action lawsuit filed against Logitech Inc. in 2017. The complaint alleges that Logitech deceptively represented that its high-definition digital video home security systems provided customers with comprehensive, reliable home security, and that the technology allowed them to view live video feeds from

Sony Xperia Devices

August 31st, 2017

In August 2017, a federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that would resolve a class-action lawsuit filed against Sony earlier in 2017. The April 2017 complaint alleges that the company deceptively advertises its Xperia smartphones and tablets as waterproof when, according to plaintiffs, they are not waterproof and not designed or capable of underwater Bait and Switch Scheme

June 9th, 2016

In June 2016, a false advertising class-action lawsuit against (a company that buys used iPhones, smartphones, laptop computers, and tablets) was transferred from a court in California to one in Nevada. The complaint, which was originally filed in March 2015, alleges that the company runs a bait and switch scam where the company generates

iPhone Trade-in

February 29th, 2016

Fine print discloses numerous conditions tied to new iPhone promotion.


April 13th, 2015

Class-action lawsuit takes a swipe at online dating app’s new policy to charge for unlimited likes.

Back to Top ↑