Results for "subscriptions"

Beyond+ Subscriptions

February 20th, 2020

February 2020: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-288, S.D. Cal.) January 2020: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Bed Bath & Beyond for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its BEYOND+ subscriptions resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Turnier et al v. Bed Bath &


Juice Plus+ Subscriptions

January 13th, 2020

January 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-12, C. D. Cal.) November 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Juice Plus+ Company and Natural Alternatives International for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions for dietary supplements resulting in consumers being charged without their consent.


Subscriptions to The Columbus Dispatch

October 7th, 2019

September 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-4262, S. D. OH.) August 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against GateHouse Media for allegedly misleadingly advertising specific prices for fixed-length subscriptions to The Columbus Dispatch when, according to plaintiffs, subscribers don’t get the newspaper for the advertised length of


Subscriptions for Stages of Beauty Cosmetics

September 24th, 2019

March 2018: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. September 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Stages of Beauty for allegedly deceptively marketing its automatic renewal and continuous service offers by failing to clearly and conspicuously disclose the terms of subscriptions for cosmetics resulting in consumers being charged


Subscriptions to Reader’s Digest and Other Magazines

September 5th, 2019

August 2019: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-1643, S. D. CA.) July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Trusted Media Brands for allegedly failing to adequately disclose to consumers that subscriptions to its magazines – including Reader’s Digest – will be automatically renewed resulting in consumers being charged for subscriptions


Subscriptions to People Magazine

June 13th, 2019

In June 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Time, Inc. and Meredith Corp. for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of subscriptions to People magazine resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Hall et al v. Time, Inc. and Meredith Corp., Case No. 19-cv-1153, C. D. CA.) For more of TINA.org’s coverage


Boxy Charm Subscriptions

June 13th, 2019

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Boxy Charm (a company that offers subscriptions for boxes of cosmetics) alleging that the company fails to adequately disclose the terms, conditions, and cancellation policy for its automatic renewal and continuous service offers, in violation of California state law. (Vasquez-Cossio et al v. Boxy Charm, Inc.,


ButcherBox Subscriptions

June 13th, 2019

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against ButcherBox (a company that offers subscriptions for beef) for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms, conditions, and cancellation policy for its automatic renewal and continuous service offers, in violation of California state law. (Johnson et al v. Butcherbox, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-876, E. D. CA.)


Subscriptions from Singles Swag Website

June 13th, 2019

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against JHB Companies for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of subscriptions for boxes of beauty products and fashion accessories on www.singlesswag.com resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Rivera et al v. JHB Companies LLC, Case No. 19-cv-4311, C. D. CA.) For more of


Finders Seekers Subscriptions

May 23rd, 2019

In May 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Finders Seekers for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions for its gift boxes resulting in consumers being charged without their consent. (Rivera et al v. Finders Seekers, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-4053, C. D. CA.)


Sinemia Subscriptions

May 13th, 2019

In April 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Sinemia Inc. for allegedly misleadingly advertising subscriptions for discounted movie theater tickets for a specific period of time when, according to plaintiffs, the company ends subscriptions before the advertised length of the subscription has passed and does not provide these terminated subscribers with refunds. The complaint


Time’s Magazine Subscriptions

April 2nd, 2019

October 2018: This case was stayed pending the approval of the settlement agreement in Cruz v. Synapse. 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Time Inc. for allegedly offering consumers free or discounted magazines for a specific term without adequately disclosing that they are enrolled in a program that automatically renews the subscriptions and, as


Promotional Subscriptions from Gannett Co.

April 2nd, 2019

March 2019: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-212, W. D. KY.) February 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Gannett Co. (a media company that sells subscriptions to newspapers) for allegedly promising new customers that they will pay reduced rates for promotional subscriptions for a specific period of time when, according


Synapse Group’s Automatic Renewals of Magazine Subscriptions

March 20th, 2019

March 2019: A state court judge granted preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to its terms, class members may receive a pro rata share of the settlement fund after other expenses – including attorneys’ fees, service payments, litigation expenses, and settlement administration expenses – are paid. In addition, the company agreed, for a


Le Tote Subscriptions

March 4th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Le Tote, Inc. (a web-based company that offers a clothing rental subscription service) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Vasquez-Cossio et al v. Le Tote, Inc., Case No.


Yoga Club Subscriptions

March 4th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Yoga Club (a company that provides subscriptions for yoga workout clothing) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms and cancellation policy of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers, in violation of California state law. (Vasquez-Cossio et al v. Yoga Club, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-348,


Apollo Box Subscriptions

March 4th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Apollo Box, Inc. (a web-based company that offers subscriptions for home décor products) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Rivera et al v. Apollo Box, Inc., Case No.


Subscriptions to BrainFM

March 4th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against BrainFM, Inc. (a web-based company that offers subscriptions for music streaming) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Rivera et al v. BrainFM, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1217, C. D.


Subscriptions to Simple Habit Meditation Products

March 4th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Simple Habit (a web-based company that offers subscriptions for meditation products) for allegedly failing to adequately present the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Rivera et al v. Simple Habit, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-1259, C.


MoviePass Subscriptions

February 25th, 2019

In February 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against MoviePass for allegedly operating a deceptive bait-and-switch scheme by misleadingly marketing that subscribers have “unlimited” access to tickets to “any movie” in “any theater” on “any day” when, according to plaintiffs, the selection of movies, showtimes, and theaters is often limited and subscribers have difficulty getting



Back to Top ↑