Airwick® Sprays

August 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

April 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Reckitt Benckiser for allegedly deceptively marketing Airwick® aerosol sprays as having the capability to eliminate odors and last up to one hour when, according to the plaintiffs, the sprays only mask odors and have little, if any, odor eliminating capabilities, and cannot provide an hour of freshness. (Agrawal et al v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Case No. 16-cv-2497, S. D. NY.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding aerosol sprays and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags:



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates