Apple iMac

May 2014: This case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

March 2014: A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit finding, among other things, that the alleged representations by Apple were “inactionable puffery.” Plaintiffs have 30 days to amend the complaint and re-file.

October 2013: A class action complaint was filed against Apple, Inc. for allegedly falsely marketing the iMac computer. Specifically, the plaintiffs claim that Apple represents the iMac computer as having, among other things, a superior quality and design when, according to plaintiffs, the company was aware of problems with and defects in the display. (Rasmussen et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-4923, N.D. CA.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Apple and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates