Apple’s iOS update

In late 2017 and early 2018, multiple class-action lawsuits were filed against Apple for allegedly misrepresenting that an iOS update to the operating software of iPhones was compatible with older iPhone models when, according to the complaints, the older phones did not function properly after the update was installed. Plaintiffs claim that Apple did not disclose that consumers who installed the update would experience several issues with the phones, including slow performance, unexpected shutdowns, and problems with the battery. To read some of the complaints, click on the links below.

• Abdulla et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-9178, N. D. IL.
• Bilic et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-449, N. D. CA.
• Bogdanovich et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-9138, C. D. CA.
• Brand et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-3453, D. SC.
• Cook et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 17-cv-2579, S. D. CA.
• Fung et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-1585, N. D. CA.
• Grillo et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-148, N. D. CA.
• Hawes et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 18-cv-1339, N. D. CA.
• Holman et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 18-cv-125, N. D. CA.
• LaNasa et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-17878, E. D. LA.
• Liebermann et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-110, N. D. CA.
• Littlefield et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 18-cv-182, N. D. CA.
• Mailyan et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 17-cv-9192, C. D. CA.
• Mallh et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 18-cv-51, E. D. NY.
• McInnis v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 17-cv-358, S. D. MS.
• Rabinovits et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 17-cv-10032, S. D. NY.
• Sens et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-60128, S. D. FL.
• Solak et al v. Apple Inc., Case No. 18-cv-123, N. D. CA.
• Sullivan-Stefanou v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-7, S. D. OH.
• Taylor et al v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-168, N. D. AL.

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Apple, click here.