Aveeno’s Natural Claims

July 2015: The Smith action was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

December 2014: This action was consolidated with a related lawsuit filed against Johnson & Johnson (Goldemberg v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies) for pretrial proceedings.

September 2014: A federal judge transferred this action to a New York court. (Case No. 14-cv-7506, S. D. NY.)

May 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Johnson & Johnson for allegedly falsely advertising Aveeno personal care products – including Aveeno Active Natural Creamy Moisturizing Oil with Natural Colloidal Oatmeal and Pure Oat Oil and Aveeno Active Naturals Clear Complexion Daily Moisturizer with Total Soy Complex – as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain harmful, unnatural, and synthetic ingredients. (Smith et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-223, N. D. FL.)

For more information about natural claims, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker

  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates