Avon Anew

July 2017: This appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

April 2017: The appeal was stayed pending a decision in a related U.S. Supreme Court case, Baker v. Microsoft Corp.

June 2016: Plaintiffs appealed the order denying class certification.

May 2016: The three named plaintiffs agreed to dismiss their individual claims for a total of $15,000 while preserving their right to appeal the class certification decision. The claims were dismissed with prejudice.

September 2015: A federal judge denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.

June 2013: A Consolidated Class Action Complaint was filed against Avon Products, Inc. (and later amended in November 2014) for allegedly deceptively marketing its ANEW line of anti-aging skincare products as providing anti-aging benefits – such as reversing wrinkles – when the products cannot deliver the advertised results. In addition, the complaint claims that the company does not have adequate scientific support for its claims. (In Re: Avon Anti-Aging Skincare Creams and Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, Case No. 13-cv-150, S. D. NY.)

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates