Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Chang et al v. Beam Financial, Inc.
20-cv-7931, N.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2020)
Beam’s Mobile Banking App
Falsely representing that Beam pays high interest rates on savings accounts and that money would be accessible to consumer “24/7”
Pending
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Grab your bag now, before Dina & Mita do
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.