Results for "baby food"

Beech-Nut Baby Foods

April 19th, 2021

Allegations: Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals


HappyBaby Baby Foods

April 19th, 2021

Allegations: Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals


Beech-Nut and Gerber Baby Foods

March 23rd, 2021

Case Name (Date) Eldridge et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Co. and Gerber Products Co. 21-cv-283, N.D.N.Y. (March 2021) Product/Service Beech-Nut and Gerber baby foods Allegations Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals Status Pending


Plum Organics Baby Foods

March 23rd, 2021

Case Names (Date) Chase et al v. Campbell Soup Co. and Plum, PBC 21-cv-4650, D.N.J. (March 2021) Gulkarov et al v. Plum, PBC 21-cv-913, N.D. Cal. (Feb. 2021) Mathiesen et al v. Plum, PBC 21-cv-1763, N.D. Cal. (March 2021) McKeon et al v. Plum, PBC and Plum, Inc. d/b/a Plum Organics 21-cv-1113, N.D. Cal. (Feb.


Gerber Baby Food Products

March 23rd, 2021

Case Names (Date) Bryan et al v. Gerber Products Co. 21-cv-349, E.D. Va. (March 2021) Hazely et al v. Gerber Products Co.21-cv-317, M.D. Fla. (Feb. 2021) Henry et al v. Gerber Products Co. (d/b/a Nestlé Nutrition, Nestlé Infant Nutrition, or Nestlé Nutrition North America) 21-cv-5864, D.N.J. (March 2021) Keeter et al v. Gerber Products Co.


Earth’s Best Baby Food

March 18th, 2021

Case Names (Date) Galloway et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-1067, E.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Mays et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-805, E.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Mays et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-1185, S.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Zorrilla et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-1062, E.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Product/Service Earth’s Best baby


Earth’s Best Baby Foods

March 16th, 2021

Case Names (Date) Anderson et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-500, D. Colo. (Feb. 2021) Baccari et al v. Hain Celestial Group 21-cv-1076, E.D.N.Y. (March 2021) Baumgarten et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-944, E.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Boyd et al v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-884, E.D.N.Y. (Feb. 2021) Hanson et


Gerber and Happy Brand Baby Foods

March 16th, 2021

Case Name (Date) Robbins et al v. Gerber Products Co. (d/b/a Nestlé Nutrition, Nestlé Infant Nutrition, or Nestlé Nutrition North America) and Nurture, Inc. (d/b/a Happy Family Brand and Happy Family Organics) 21-cv-1457, C.D. Cal. (Feb. 2021) Product/Service Gerber, HappyBABY, HappyTOT, and HappyKID baby foods Allegations Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals


Earth’s Best and Gerber Baby Foods

February 18th, 2021

Case Name (Date) Garces et al v. Gerber Products Co. and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 21-cv-719, N.D. Ill. (Feb. 2021) Product/Service Earth’s Best and Gerber baby foods Allegations Failing to disclose baby foods contain toxic heavy metals Status Pending


Gerber Baby Food

October 19th, 2018

March 2018: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint making similar allegations that Gerber violated the law by making nutrient content and “No Sugar Added” claims because the nutritional needs of infants and toddlers are different than adults. February 2018: A federal judge denied class certification concluding that the named plaintiff did not have standing to pursue


Happy Baby Superfood Puffs

February 22nd, 2021

In February 2021, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Nurture, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly marketing Happy Baby Superfood Puffs as healthy, nutritious, and suitable for children when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain significant amounts of ingredients that have dangerous health consequences for children, including arsenic, mercury, lead, cadmium, and perchlorate. (Soto et al v.


“Earth’s Best” Brand Products

July 18th, 2014

In July 2014, another class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that the company misleadingly labels the “Earth’s Best” brand products – including infant foods, baby foods, kids’ foods, baby care products, and home care products –as “all natural” and “organic” when, in actuality, the products contain


Humphreys Homeopathic Products

November 19th, 2013

October 2013: A federal judge approved a $1.4 million settlement to a class-action lawsuit against Humphreys Pharmacal Inc. and Dickinson Brands, Inc. According to the settlement terms, class members will receive a full refund up to $10 for each eligible product purchased (with a max of $50 per household for class members without proof of



Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates