Results for "deodorant"

JĀSÖN Brand Deodorant Sticks

September 24th, 2019

January 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against The Hain Celestial Group for allegedly misleadingly marketing JĀSÖN brand deodorant sticks as natural when, according to the complaint, they contain unnatural or synthetic ingredients. The


Wahl Dog Shampoos and Deodorants

January 16th, 2019

December 2018: The parties requested that the Court enter an order staying the case because they reached a settlement agreement. 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Wahl Clipper Corporation for allegedly misleadingly advertising dog shampoo and deodorant products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain unnatural, synthetic ingredients. (McAllister et al


Arm & Hammer® Essentials™ Natural Deodorant

May 12th, 2017

June 2015: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. February 2015: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this class-action lawsuit. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a full refund for every purchase and class members without proof of purchase may receive a $4 refund


“Unscented” Deodorants

September 27th, 2016

May 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. November 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble, Revlon, Dial, and others for allegedly deceptively labeling deodorants – including Arm & Hammer Essentials, Arm & Hammer UltraMax, Secret Outlast, Mitchum Men’s, Mitchum Women’s, Dry Idea,


Speed Stick® Deodorants

September 19th, 2016

August 2015: The claims in this lawsuit were dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. September 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive Company for allegedly deceptively packaging deodorants and antiperspirants, including Speed Stick® Power and Speed Stick® Deodorant. According to the complaint, the size of the container gives consumers the


Ban® Invisible Solids Deodorants

August 2nd, 2016

October 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. April 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Kao USA Inc., the marketer of Ban® deodorant and antiperspirants, for allegedly deceptively marketing Ban® Invisible Solids Deodorants. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the deodorant containers misleadingly list the net


Degree® and Dove® Deodorants

August 2nd, 2016

October/November 2015: This action was dismissed , in accordance with the terms of a Confidential Settlement Agreement. June 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly deceptively packaging and labeling Degree® and Dove® deodorants and antiperspirants. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the packaging includes net weight statements that are actually greater than the


The Packaging for Gillette® and Old Spice® Deodorants

August 2nd, 2016

October 2015: The named plaintiff dismissed this action . The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. August 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly misleadingly using ed packaging for deodorants – including Gillette® Odor Shield Invisible Solid, Old Spice® High Endurance Invisible Solid, Old Spice® Champion, and Old


Degree® Deodorants

April 8th, 2016

September 2015: A federal judge dismissed this lawsuit. The false advertising claims were dismissed because plaintiffs did not sufficiently allege that advertisements are false and that they relied on such false claims. Other claims – including the slack-fill and usable net weight claims – were dismissed because the judge found that the FDA regulates the


Gillette® and Old Spice® Deodorants

September 22nd, 2015

December 2014: The parties agreed to dismiss this lawsuit. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed. September 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Procter & Gamble for allegedly deceptively packaging several antiperspirants and deodorants, including Gillette® Odor Shield Invisible Solid, Old Spice® High Endurance Invisible Solid, and Old Spice® Classic. The


THAYERS Natural Remedies

October 29th, 2019

In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Henry Thayer Company for allegedly falsely advertising THAYERS® Natural Remedies products – including deodorants, facial mists, and toning towelettes – as “natural” when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain synthetic and abrasive chemical ingredients. In addition, the complaint claims that the company markets its dry mouth


Dove Invisible Dryspray

October 17th, 2019

October 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2704, E. D. MO.) July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly misleadingly advertising that Dove Invisible Dryspray antiperspirants do not leave any white marks when, according to plaintiffs, the active ingredient in the antiperspirants (aluminum chlorohydrate) actually


Degree MotionSense UltraClear Black + White DrySpray

October 11th, 2019

October 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2703, E. D. MO.) July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly falsely advertising Degree MotionSense UltraClear Black + White DrySpray antiperspirant for women. Specifically, the complaint claims that the company misleadingly represents that the antiperspirant is “anti


Axe Anti-Marks Antiperspirants

October 11th, 2019

October 2019: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2723, E. D. MO.) July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Unilever for allegedly falsely marketing that its Axe Anti Marks Protection line of antiperspirants provides protection from and do not produce white marks and yellow stains when, according to plaintiffs, the active


Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirants

October 11th, 2019

October 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2710, E. D. MO.) July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive for allegedly falsely marketing Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirants as fighting yellow stains and white marks while providing odor and wetness protection when, according to plaintiffs, the active


Various Tom’s of Maine Products

April 27th, 2018

October 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. November 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive and Tom’s of Maine for allegedly falsely marketing products – including toothpastes, mouthwashes, deodorants, lotions, creams, body washes, and baby products — as natural when they actually have artificial, synthetic,


Olivina Men’s Products

January 23rd, 2018

December 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. November 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Olivina Napa Valley for allegedly falsely advertising products for men – including Olivina Men All-In-One Body Wash Bourbon Cedar and Olivina Men Bourbon Cedar Aluminum-Free Deodorant – as “Naturally Pure” to



Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates