ChapStick Natural Claims

In December 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings and Pfizer for allegedly falsely advertising ChapStick products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain synthetic, artificial, and highly-processed ingredients. (Moore et al v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US) LLC and Pfizer Inc., Case No. 20-cv-9077, N.D. Cal.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of natural marketing claims, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: , ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates