Chicco KidFit Booster Seats
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds and providing protection in side-impact collisions
Chicco Booster Seats
Case Name (Date)
Sayers et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
21-cv-1876, E.D. Penn.
(April 2021)
Product/Service
Chicco booster seats, including KidFit, KidFit Zip Plus, KidFit Zip Air Plus, and KidFit Adapt Plus
Allegations
Falsely advertising booster seats as safe for children who weigh 30 pounds when the seats are not safe for children who weigh less than 40 pounds
Misleadingly marketing that booster seats have been side-impact tested and provide protection in side-impact collisions when testing does not show that the seats are safe in side-impact collisions and the seats do not appreciably reduce the risk of serious injury
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Chicco Car Seats
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain hazardous chemicals
The Latest
Polaris Advertising
TINA.org investigates where these clickbait emails are actually coming from.
Welcome Aboard the Hungry Skies Presented by SNICKERS
SNICKERS is coming to the rescue for all flight attendants and passengers who need help 36K feet in the air.
Kettle ‘Air Fried’ Potato Chips
Lawsuit alleges Kettle is cooking up something deceptive with its “air fried” claims.
CATrends: Microplastics in Bottled Water
Lawsuits allege that several brands contain microplastics despite being marketed as “natural spring water.”
Evony: The King’s Return
Regulator finds ad on X misrepresented game’s “core playing experience.”