How a TINA.org Reader Tip Led to a Record Penalty for False Made in USA Claims
FTC says civil penalty against Williams-Sonoma is “the largest ever in a Made in USA case.”
June 2020: The Court granted final approval of a settlement agreement.
June 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-3369, N.D. Cal.)
May 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against the manufacturers and marketers of the ASUS ROG Strix GL502VS and GL502VSK laptops. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the companies misleadingly market the laptops as portable laptops with graphics processors that are suitable for gaming and video editing when, according to the plaintiffs, the laptops have a power defect that causes significant reductions in their performance and causes the batteries to drain and degrade. In addition, the complaint alleges that the companies misrepresent that the laptops have two cooling systems (one for the computational processing unit and one for the graphics processing unit) to give them the “stability required for intense gaming” when, according to the plaintiffs, the cooling systems are not independent and the laptops have reduced durability and performance because they run much hotter than other laptops. (Carlotti et al v. ASUS Computer International (North America) Inc and ASUSTEK Computer Inc., Case No. 18903641, California Superior Court – County of Alameda)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of computers, click here.
FTC says civil penalty against Williams-Sonoma is “the largest ever in a Made in USA case.”
The NBA superstar isn’t just cashing endorsement checks.
Lawsuit alleges environmental claims don’t stick.
Got milk? Apparently not.
Flag on the play.