Cosmetics at Ulta Beauty
In January 2018, a false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Ulta Beauty for allegedly selling used cosmetics as if they were new. According to the complaint, cosmetics that have…
In March 2018, another class-action lawsuit was filed against Ulta Beauty for allegedly misleading consumers by repackaging returned products to make them look new, unused, and unopened and then reselling them as if they are new. Plaintiffs also allege that the store provides consumers with coupons for free products that it claims are redeemable at all stores when, according to the complaint, many stores are unaware of the promotion and do not have the free products to give to consumers. (Ogurkiewicz et al v. Ulta Beauty Inc., Case No. 2018-CH-03006, Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Ulta Beauty and TINA.org’s coverage of the store, click here.
In January 2018, a false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Ulta Beauty for allegedly selling used cosmetics as if they were new. According to the complaint, cosmetics that have…
Following a complaint by ad watchdog truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), Pottery Barn’s parent company Williams-Sonoma has agreed to pay more than $3 million for violating a 2020 FTC consent order requiring that…
FTC says civil penalty against Williams-Sonoma is “the largest ever in a Made in USA case.”
The NBA superstar isn’t just cashing endorsement checks.
Lawsuit alleges environmental claims don’t stick.
Got milk? Apparently not.