Status & Updates
May 21, 2018: The U.S. Magistrate Judge presiding over the case recommended denying preliminary approval of the settlement agreement reached between the parties because he concluded that the named plaintiff in the case failed to demonstrate that he would fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
September 20, 2016: Court grants TINA.org’s Motion for Leave to file second amicus curiae letter.
August 16, 2016: TINA.org files a second letter with the Court as amicus curiae, this time opposing the amended settlement agreement and again urging the Court to deny preliminary approval of the settlement.
June 24, 2016: The parties reach an amended settlement agreement, which addresses many — but not all — of the issues raised by TINA.org regarding the injunctive relief portion of the settlement, though it continues to allow CVS to make implied treatment claims and still provides insufficient monetary relief to class members.
June 7, 2016: Court grants TINA.org’s Motion for Leave to file amicus curiae letter.
June 3, 2016: TINA.org files a letter with the Court as amicus curiae opposing the proposed settlement and urging the Court to deny preliminary approval of the settlement.