Krispy Kreme Blueberry and Maple Doughnuts

August 2018: This case was dismissed without prejudice because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.

April 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Krispy Kreme for allegedly misleadingly using words such as “blueberry” and “maple” in the names of doughnuts when, according to the complaint, the doughnuts do not contain these ingredients. (Agajanyan et al v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp., Case No. 18-cv-2885, C. D. CA.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Krispy Kreme, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates