Krispy Kreme Donuts

April 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs and without prejudice as to the class members. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.

November 2016:class-action lawsuit was filed against Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (and amended in December 2016) for allegedly falsely representing that donuts and donut holes contain ingredients that they do not. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that Krispy Kreme’s “Chocolate Iced Raspberry Filled” and “Glazed Raspberry Filled” donuts do not contain any raspberries, its “Maple Iced Glazed” and “Maple Bar” donuts do not contain maple sugar or maple syrup, and its “Glazed Blueberry Cake” donut and donut holes do not contain any blueberries. (Saidian et al v. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-8338, C. D. CA.)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: , ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates