Published on January 8th, 20150
Lawmakers Raise Questions about Deceptive Marketing in Solar Industry
Solar leases have become an increasingly attractive option for homeowners who are looking to shave energy costs but who may not have the money to pay upfront for the panels. (Installation costs for solar ownership can run upwards of $20,000. Homeowners who lease, by contrast, pay nothing upfront for installation.) Often, though, the leases lock homeowners into decades-long agreements that some lawmakers say will likely exceed both the life of the roof and the time that the homeowner lives under it.
A recent letter to the FTC signed by a dozen Republican members of the House of Representatives highlighted the concerns:
As a very new industry with a limited track record and little regulatory oversight, the solar leasing market may pose a considerable risk to the increasingly large numbers of American consumers that commit to the leasing product without all of the relevant information (not to mention the American taxpayer, who heavily subsidizes each rooftop solar project).
The Republicans asked the agency what options exist to ensure that consumers are fully apprised of the costs, benefits and financial risks of solar leasing arrangements and what recourse there is for the consumers to be held harmless for the remainder of the lease if a company fails. They also pointed to the problems that arise when homeowners want to sell their houses after entering into 20- to 30-year solar leases.
A burden to bear
“We have already heard stories about consumers not being able to sell their homes or having to eat expensive leases because the new homeowner did not want to take on the lease burden,” said Jeff Small, legislative director for U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, the House Republican from Arizona who spearheaded the letter. “There are even more dangerous liabilities for customers that lease if these companies were to go under during that lease.”
Among other things, the letter calls for the creation of a “resource center” where homeowners can evaluate the risks involved with leasing solar panels before they commit financially.
An FTC spokesperson confirmed that the agency received the Dec. 12 letter but declined to comment further on the communications. The FTC’s Green Guides addresses the marketing of renewable energy such as solar but focuses on misleading environmental claims rather than misleading financial promises.
A comparison to the subprime mortgage crisis
House Democrats have also sounded an alarm. In a recent joint letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), they warned that “easy financial terms, increased demand and a rapidly expanding industry” are the same factors that led to the subprime mortgage crisis.
U.S. Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, also of Arizona, said she has received numerous complaints about solar rooftop leasing practices in the state and wrote in the letter:
At the core of my concerns are reports that solar leasing companies may be overstating the economic benefits of signing a long-term solar lease while failing to disclose important information during the sales process. For example, customers are quoted savings each month on their utility bills. However, who calculates those estimations and are they accurate?
Small, Gosar’s legislative director, said one homeowner who met with Rep. Gosar shared a SolarCity sales brochure that quoted savings based on the customers’ current utility company rate increasing by 4 percent annually.
“This has never happened in Arizona,” he said. “The highest it has ever been was around 3 percent and usually it’s less than 1 percent.”
SolarCity states on its website that “[h]istorically, utility rates have increased over 5 percent every year.”
When asked to substantiate this claim, SolarCity spokesman Jonathan Bass told TINA.org: “Basically, SolarCity offers service in the areas where we can provide solar electricity at a discount to utility rates, and those areas have historically seen higher retail electricity rate increases than other parts of the country.” (Update 12/10/15: SolarCity now claims that “utility rates have been increasing over time,” dropping the “5 percent” figure.)
“Our sales proposals are very clear that we do not guarantee the estimated savings to the customers, and we seek to explain this to customers during the sales process,” Bass added.
Tom Kimbis, vice president of executive affairs for the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), said that there are consumer safeguards in place but that homeowners still need to thoroughly educate themselves on the solar product before making an investment.
“SEIA requires all its member companies to sign a code of ethics and works to ensure responsible and sustainable business practices and high-quality training across the solar industry,” Kimbis said.
The CFPB did not return a request for comment.
Tips for leasing solar
While the FTC and CFPB mull over the concerns raised by more than a dozen members of Congress, homeowners looking into leasing solar panels — as with any big investment — should proceed carefully. Here are a few tips:
- Shop around — Get multiple bids so that you are not putting all your faith in the savings calculations of the one leasing company that is trying to win your business.
- Run the numbers yourself — The Department of Energy has a formula where homeowners can estimate the annual electricity production and electric bill cost savings for a grid-connected home solar system.
- Remember, it’s a long-term investment — You may not want to enter into a 20- or 30-year leasing arrangement if you do not plan on living in your home for the entire duration of the lease. If you choose to put your home on the market, prospective buyers may not want to assume the remaining cost of the solar lease. Inquire whether there are any early termination alternatives.
- No guarantee — Even the industry leader, SolarCity, carries the following disclaimer at the bottom of its website: “Savings on your total electricity costs is not guaranteed.”
For more of our coverage on energy issues, click here.
This story was updated 12/10/15.