Multi-Level Marketing

Published on November 7th, 2017

0

Lawsuits Against LuLaRoe Keep Mounting

In the past three weeks, LuLaRoe has been hit with at least four federal class actions alleging that the company is a pyramid scheme and/or claiming that it has engaged in deceptive and unfair practices with regard to its return policy. The complaints are coming in so quickly that it’s hard to keep up. Below are the federal cases that TINA.org is currently tracking. For more coverage of LuLaRoe, click here.

Case Name
(Court, Date Filed)
Claim Status
Atkinson v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Nov. 2017)
Pyramid Scheme Allegations Pending
Patton v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Nov. 2017)
Issues with Return Policy Pending
Haskett v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Oct. 2017)
Pyramid Scheme Allegations Pending
Berry v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., October 2017)
Pyramid Scheme Allegations Pending
Lemberg v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Oct. 2017)
Issues with Return Policy Pending
Heinichen v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., May 2017)
Defective Leggings Pending**
Mack v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., May 2017)
Defective Leggings Pending**
Doran v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Apr. 2017)*
Defective Leggings Pending**
Goodwin v. LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Mar. 2017)*
Defective Leggings Pending**
Dean v LuLaRoe
(C. D. CA., Mar. 2017)
Defective Leggings Pending**
Webster v. LuLaRoe
(W. D. PA., Feb. 2017)
Issues with Sales Tax Pending

*Case was originally filed in state court and transferred to federal court

** Five similar lawsuits (Heinichen, Mack, Doran, Goodwin, and Dean) were transferred to the same court to be heard by the same judge.

Update 11/15/17 – chart was updated.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: ,




Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑