Lifetime Subscriptions to Sirius XM Radio

2020: The named plaintiff in this case entered into a settlement agreement that was reached in a related case, Alvarez v. Sirius XM Radio.

December 2018: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed for undisclosed reasons.

June 2017: A federal judge granted Sirius XM Radio’s motion to compel compliance with the dispute resolution procedures the parties agreed to in the Customer Agreement and dismissed this case without prejudice. Later in June, the named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal.

September 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sirius XM Radio for allegedly deceiving consumers by advertising lifetime subscriptions without adequately disclosing that the subscriptions were for the lifetime of the receiver or automobile and not for the lifetime of the consumer. (Wright et al v. Sirius XM Radio Inc., Case No. 16-cv-1688, C.D. Cal.)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates