Published on February 12th, 20150
Misleading Pricing Issues Focus of Target Settlement
The Minnesota-based retail giant agreed to strengthen its price controls and oversight after prosecutors alleged in a lawsuit filed in Marin County Superior Court that the company charged customers higher prices on items than their lowest advertised price, misrepresented how much products actually weighed and didn’t ensure its price scanners were accurate, thus violating a previous 2008 injunction.
Now, Target, which is the second largest retailer in the U.S., will have to post signs in its California stores stating:
If an item scans at a price higher than the lowest currently advertised or posted price, please advise your cashier immediately of the corrected price and we will charge you the lowest advertised.
It also has to designate a pricing compliance officer to oversee accuracy in stores in the state, conduct frequent pricing audits, including a once a week review of price and sale signs posted in each store to make sure they are up to date, better train its employees and hire a third-party auditor to ensure the weights of products are what the labels and signage say they are.
That’s all great. But the downside of the settlement is that none of the almost $4 million in penalties will go directly to consumers who were overcharged. The agreement stipulates that it is “impractical and impossible to identify or provide direct restitution to consumers who may have unknowingly been overcharged.” Instead, $200,000 will go to the state’s Consumer Protection Prosecution Trust Fund, and the rest will be split among five district attorney offices in California, as well as some other state agencies.
Let’s hope Target, whose slogan is “Expect More. Pay Less,” doesn’t pass along the cost of increasing its pricing accuracy to consumers who are already peeved about being overcharged.