Move Free®

November 2015: After the settlement in the Lerma case was approved in October 2015, this lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice.

November 2014: The parties in the lawsuit asked the court to suspend the judicial proceedings in the case because Schiff Nutrition reached a settlement agreement in another similar case (Lerma v. Schiff), and that settlement, if approved, would also settle the claims in this case.

December 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Schiff Nutrition for allegedly advertising its Move Free® line of dietary supplements containing glucosamine and chondroitin as providing various joint health benefits – such as helping to protect cartilage and improving joint comfort and function – without the scientific evidence to support such claims.

To learn more about the Lerma case, click here. (Flowers et al. v. Schiff Nutrition, Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., Schiff Nutrition Group, Inc., Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Reckitt Benckiser North America, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-09406, C.D. CA.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Schiff Nutrition International and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases