Class Action

MusclePharm Arnold Schwarzenegger Series Iron Mass

Class Action

MusclePharm Arnold Schwarzenegger Series Iron Mass

October 2018: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal and remanded the case for further proceedings. (Case No. 16-15374, 9th Cir.)

March 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal.

February 2016: The named plaintiff notified the Court that he will not be amending the complaint but rather intends to appeal the dismissal decision.

December 2015: A federal judge dismissed the complaint finding that, among other things, the named plaintiff did not sufficiently plead that he relied on the allegedly deceptive advertising in making his purchasing decision. The court gave him 21 days to amend the complaint in order to fix the problems.

January 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against MusclePharm for allegedly falsely marketing the dietary supplement MusclePharm Arnold Schwarzenegger Series Iron Mass. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company uses a practice called “protein-spiking” (i.e., adding cheaper non-protein ingredients, such as amino acids, to increase the nitrogen content, which then makes it appear as if the product contains more protein than it actually has) and, as a result, the product contains approximately 50% less protein than the company represents. (Durnford et al v. MusclePharm Corp., Case No. 15-cv-00413, N. D. CA.).

To learn more about other class-action lawsuits regarding “protein-spiking” and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

And for more on the lawsuit against MusclePharm, click here.

 


Class-Action Tracker

MusclePharm Glutamine Dietary Supplement

Class Action

MusclePharm Glutamine Dietary Supplement

In March 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against MusclePharm Corp. for allegedly falsely advertising the dietary supplement MusclePharm Glutamine. According to the complaint, the company markets the supplement as…

The Packaging of Various MusclePharm Supplements

Class Action

The Packaging of Various MusclePharm Supplements

August 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiffs and When a complaint is dismissed without…

FitMiss Fat-Burning Supplements

Class Action

FitMiss Fat-Burning Supplements

July 2015: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. October 2014: A class-action…

Various MusclePharm Supplements

Class Action

Various MusclePharm Supplements

September 2016: A federal judge granted MusclePharm’s motion to dismiss finding, among other things, that plaintiffs did not have standing, failed to state a claim, and did not satisfy the…


The Latest

Filters