Neutrogena Sunscreen

December 2017: The remaining claims in this case were voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, the reasons for which were not disclosed.

October 2017: The claims relating to the Pure & Free® sunscreens were consolidated with a similar case, Fagan v. Neutrogena. The claims relating to the other products remain pending in this case.

April 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. for allegedly falsely marketing Neutrogena sunscreens – including Sensitive Skin Sunscreen, Pure & Free®, Sheer Zinc™, and Neutrogena Naturals – as being natural when, according to plaintiffs, they actually contain artificial and synthetic ingredients. (Hernandez et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Does 1-25, Case No. 17-cv-680, C. D. CA.)

For more information about other lawsuits regarding sunscreens and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.

For more information about natural claims, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates