Results for "pricing"

Discounts at Columbia Sportswear Outlet Stores

January 29th, 2018

January 2018: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. November 2017: There was a hearing on the motion for preliminary approval and, if there are no objections, the settlement will become effective January 16, 2018. October 2017: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement. According to its terms, Columbia


StubHub

January 26th, 2018

NAD says service fees should be disclosed alongside initial ticket prices, as opposed to at checkout.


Discounts at Stein Mart

December 14th, 2017

April 2017: This case was dismissed and consolidated with another lawsuit against the store, Sperling v. Stein Mart. March 2017: One of the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed his claims , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The claims of the other named plaintiff and the class remain pending. (Schuh et al v. Stein


Advertised Discounts at Kohl’s

December 1st, 2017

March 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. The dismissal was as the named plaintiffs’ individual claims and as to the class members’ claims. November 2013: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint making similar allegations that the store deceptively advertised pricing discounts. May 2013: The Ninth Circuit Court of


Discounts at The Gap and Banana Republic

November 29th, 2017

In October 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Gap and Banana Republic for allegedly deceptively advertising discounts on apparel by misleadingly comparing lower discounted prices to fake original prices when, according to the complaint, items are never offered for sale at the fake original prices. The lawsuit was transferred to federal court in


Discounts at The Gap and Banana Republic Stores

November 1st, 2017

In October 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against The Gap and Banana Republic for allegedly deceptively advertising pricing discounts on apparel and other merchandise by misleadingly comparing percentage-off discounts to fake original prices. According to the complaint, the store consistently and regularly sells items at “discounted” prices and thus customers do not actually save


Sales on J. Crew Factory Website

October 27th, 2017

In December 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against J. Crew for allegedly representing products on the Factory website are sold at significant discounts when, according to the complaint, products are designed for the Factory website and they are actually being sold at their ordinary retail price. (The complaint was amended in May 2017.) (Delman


Summary of Action

October 2nd, 2017

TINA.org investigated price advertising tactics used by outlet stores in Connecticut and found pervasive deception.  Specifically, TINA.org visited four outlet stores at Clinton Crossing Premium Outlets in Clinton, Connecticut – J. Crew Factory, Coach Outlet, Hanna Andersson, and Skechers – on a weekly basis for more than six months (from February 17, 2017 to August 28,


Sales Prices at GNC

September 28th, 2017

September 2017: A federal judge stayed the proceedings in this case pursuant to the parties’ request while they finalize the terms of a settlement agreement. April 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against GNC in April 2016 (and amended in August 2016) for allegedly misleadingly marketing the existence, nature, and amount of discounts


DSW Discounts

September 27th, 2017

September 2017: A federal judge dismissed the breach of warranty and breach of contract claims. Other claims will move forward. May 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against DSW (a store that sells shoes, handbags, and accessories) for allegedly deceptively advertising price discounts on merchandise sold only at DSW stores by comparing a discounted price


Sale Prices at J. Crew

September 26th, 2017

September 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed , the reasons for which have not been disclosed. June 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against J. Crew for allegedly falsely advertising discounts by comparing false “regular prices” to “discounted prices.” According to the complaint, the regular prices are overstated and not the prevailing market price within


Discounts on Gap Factory and Banana Republic Factory Websites

September 19th, 2017

February 2017: After the complaint was amended in December 2016, a federal judge dismissed claims for equitable relief (a nonmonetary judgment, such as a court order requiring a party to act or prohibiting a party from acting) because the named plaintiff has other remedies available to her. The claims were dismissed . Other claims will


Discounts at Wish

September 14th, 2017

August 2017: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision. Later in August, the named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the district court action, the reasons for which were not disclosed. The dismissal was . December 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the November 2016 decision. November 2016: A federal


Advertised Discounts at Nordstrom Rack

September 11th, 2017

July 2017: The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to dismiss this false advertising lawsuit against Nordstrom. August 2015: A federal judge granted the store’s motion to dismiss finding, among other things, that the complaint did not adequately allege injury. December 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Nordstrom


Discounts at Burlington Coat Factory

September 8th, 2017

July 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement. January 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved the Amended Settlement Agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for July 24, 2017. For more information, go to https://eclaim.kccllc.net/caclaimforms/buh/Home.aspx. December 2016: The parties revised the terms of the settlement agreement, which now gives class members the option


Discounts on Products Sold at 24 Hour Fitness

August 30th, 2017

In August 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against 24 Hour Fitness USA for allegedly misrepresenting pricing discounts on products for sale at its gyms by offering steep discounts off of false former prices. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the represented “Reg Price” was artificial, arbitrary, and not the prevailing market retail price for the


Sales at Jos. A. Bank

July 26th, 2017

May 2017: This case was stayed pending a Supreme Court of New Jersey decision. February 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Jos. A. Bank Clothiers in February 2017. The complaint alleges that the store deceptively advertises limited time discounts of “up to” a certain percentage on apparel and other merchandise when, according


Discounts at LensCrafters

July 26th, 2017

In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against LensCrafters for allegedly deceptively advertising pricing discounts on prescription lenses. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the retailer advertises specific percentage discounts off of regular prices of lenses when, according to the complaint, the regular price is not displayed until after the purchase and the lenses are never


Discount Prices at Cole Haan Outlet Stores

July 19th, 2017

In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Cole Haan for allegedly misleadingly advertising pricing discounts at outlet stores. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company markets an “original” price for items in outlet stores to make customers believe they are purchasing items that were once sold for that price in retail stores when,


Sales at Nine West

July 18th, 2017

In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Nine West for allegedly deceptively advertising pricing discounts at outlet stores. According to the complaint, the store deceptively compares a “SUGG. RETAIL” price to a fictitious “OUR PRICE” to make consumers believe they are getting merchandise at a steep discount when, according to plaintiffs, consumers are



Back to Top ↑