Phyto Stem Cell+ Anti-Aging Skincare Products

July 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s individual claims were dismissed with prejudice and class members’ claims were dismissed without prejudice.

March 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against G.M. Collin for allegedly falsely marketing Phyto Stem Cell+ anti-aging products. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the company falsely represents that the cosmetics will stimulate collagen synthesis, promote skin cell survival and longevity, and reverse the signs of aging when, in reality, the cosmetics cannot deliver such results. (Reid et al v. GMC Skin Care USA Inc. d/b/a G.M. Collin, Case No. 15-cv-00277, N. D. NY.).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding anti-aging products and’s coverage of the products, click here.

For more information about the advertising of cosmetics and’s coverage of the topic, click here.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker

  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates