Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In March 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Puff Corp. (a company that manufactures and markets vaporizers for cannabis concentrates and other smoking materials) for allegedly misleadingly representing that its PUFFCO PEAK vaporizers are reliable when, according to plaintiffs, the batteries do not charge properly and the atomizers do not heat properly due to defects. (Anderson et al v. Puff Corp., Case No. 19-cv-2126, D. AZ.)
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Grab your bag now, before Dina & Mita do
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.