Pure & Free® Sunscreens

November 2017: This consolidated action was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

October 2017: This case was consolidated with another similar case filed against Neutrogena for its marketing of Pure & Free®, Hernandez v. Johnson & Johnson.

2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Neutrogena for allegedly falsely advertising Pure & Free® sunscreens as being 100% natural when, according to plaintiffs, the sunscreens contain unnatural and synthetic ingredients. The complaint was originally filed in July and amended in September. (Fagan et al v. Neutrogena Corp., Case No. 13-cv-1316, C. D. CA.)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker

  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases