Saks Fifth Avenue

February 2015: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed.

October 2014: This lawsuit was transferred from state court to federal court. (Malik et al v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC and Does 1-50, Case No. 14-cv-07600, C. D. CA.).

August 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Saks Fifth Avenue for allegedly misleadingly representing discounts on items sold at Saks Off 5th outlet stores by comparing a false retail store price to a lower outlet store price, when, in reality, the items were never sold at the Saks Fifth Avenue retail store. (Malik v. Saks Fifth Avenue LLC, Case No. BC555134, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles).

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the advertising of discounts and’s coverage of the issue, click here.

To learn more about the deceptive advertising of sales, click here to read’s article, The Price Is (Not Necessarily) Right.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker

  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases