SnoreStop

October 2017: A California appellate court reversed the trial court decision finding that plaintiffs did present enough evidence to support their claims, and directed the trial court to enter a judgment in favor of plaintiffs. (Rosendez et al v. Green Pharmaceuticals, Case No. D071073, California Court of Appeals – Fourth District)

2014: After plaintiffs presented evidence at trial, the judge assigned to the case concluded that plaintiffs did not present enough evidence to support their claims and entered a judgment in favor of Green Pharmaceuticals.

2011: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Green Pharmaceuticals for allegedly deceptively marketing SnoreStop as a pill that stops snoring when, according to plaintiffs, it has no impact on snoring. (Rosendez et al v. Green Pharmaceuticals, Case No. CIVDS1108022, California Superior Court – San Bernardino)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates