Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirants

October 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 19-cv-2710, E. D. MO.)

July 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive for allegedly falsely marketing Speed Stick Stain Guard Antiperspirants as fighting yellow stains and white marks while providing odor and wetness protection when, according to plaintiffs, the active ingredient (aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY) actually causes white marks and yellow stains and the antiperspirant is less-effective than other products because the active ingredient is diluted. (Huskey et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., Case No. 19-cv-2710, Missouri State Court – St. Louis)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of deodorants, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates