Speed Stick Stain Guard

January 2021: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 21-cv-36, E.D. Mo.)

December 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Colgate-Palmolive Company for allegedly falsely advertising that Speed Stick Stain Guard antiperspirants fight yellow stains and do not leave white marks when, according to plaintiffs, the primary active ingredient in them (aluminum zirconium tetrachlorohydrex GLY) causes both yellow stains and white marks. (Muller et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Case No. 20SL-CC05898, Missouri State Court – St. Louis County)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Speed Stick products, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker

  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates