Starbucks Sour Gummies

September 2019: This case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice for undisclosed reasons after a federal judge dismissed several of the claims – including the nationwide class claims – and expressed concerns that the court no longer had subject matter jurisdiction.

October 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Starbucks for allegedly falsely advertising its sour gummies as “apple, watermelon, tangerine and lemon-flavored candies” to make consumers believe they are flavored with natural ingredients when, according to plaintiffs, the candies contain artificial flavors. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in 2019.) (Brown v. Starbucks Corp., Case No. 18-cv-2286, S.D. Cal.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Starbucks, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Tags: , ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates