Strange Honey

In December 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Strange Honey Farm for allegedly misleadingly marketing that its honey products are 100% raw honey from Tennessee when, according to the complaint, the product is not 100% honey because it also contains syrup, the honey is not raw because it has been heated, and some of the honey used in the product comes from outside of Tennessee. (Greer et al v. Strange Honey Farm, LLC et al, Case No. 19-cv-518, E. D. Tenn.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of honey products, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags:



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates