Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
September 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-1274, E.D. Cal.)
August 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company for allegedly falsely advertising that the monthly premium for its automobile insurance policies would be a specific price per month when, according to plaintiffs, the insurance company does not disclose that it increases the amount of monthly premiums to double the advertised price. (Morrison et al v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Case No. BCV-20-101826, California State Court – Kern County)
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Grab your bag now, before Dina & Mita do
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.