The Packaging of Various GNC Protein Whey Protein Products

March 2017: Both cases were dismissed pursuant to a joint motion to dismiss filed by the parties. The claims were dismissed with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs and without prejudice as to the class members.

January 2017: The parties notified the Court that they reached a confidential settlement agreement, along with the parties in a related case, Polanco v. GNC.

October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against GNC for allegedly deceptively packaging its Whey Protein products, including AMP Amplified Gold Whey Protein, AMP Amplified Wheybolic Extreme, and 100% Whey Protein products. According to the complaint, the containers for these products are opaque and contain approximately 40% empty space. (Gioia et al v. GNC Holdings, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-2273, S. D. CA.)

For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding slack-filled packaging and TINA.org’s coverage of the topic, click here.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

You know when you buy a big bag of chips, and you’re all psyched for a feast, and then it turns out there are like, three chips in the bag? That bag is slack filled.

Tags: , , ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates