Total Hydration ChapStick

December 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.

September 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Pfizer for allegedly mislabeling certain Total Hydration ChapStick brand products as “100% NATURAL” and “Clinically Proven” to provide “healthier,” “more youthful looking lips” when, according to plaintiffs, the products contain synthetic ingredients and there are no competent or reliable studies to support the company’s “clinically proven” claims. (Tyman et al v. Pfizer, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-6941, S. D. NY.)

For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: , ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases

  • Sign Up for E-mail Updates