U-Haul’s Reservation Guarantee Policy

June 2020: This case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.

May 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul for allegedly falsely representing its reservation guarantee policy. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that, if a customer makes reservations and does not receive the agreed upon equipment size, location, or pick up time, U-Haul will pay the customer $50 when, according to the complaint, the company often fails to pay the $50 when the correct equipment is not available at the specified time and location. (Newman et al v. U-Haul Co. of New York and Vermont, Inc., U-Haul International, Inc., and Amerco, Case No. 18-cv-4751, S.D.N.Y.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of U-Haul, click here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases