UA’s Rush Clothing Line

Case Name
(Date)
Dill et al v. Under Armour, Inc.
20-cv-6066, E.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2020)
Product/Service UA Rush Clothing Line
Allegations Falsely marketing the clothing improves athletic performance by converting heat absorbed from the human body into “recycled energy” that increases blood circulation
Status Pending
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: ,



Leave a Reply

Back to Top ↑
  • Search Class-Action Tracker



  • Recent Class Actions

  • The Class-Action Tracker is intended to notify consumers about false advertising class-action lawsuits filed around the country, but does not necessarily reflect TINA.org’s opinion with respect to the lawsuits or disposition of the cases